🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Officials, campaigners, and parents are observing closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a increasing group of countries are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our children's innocence". Legislation is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "an options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on lawmakers to approve a bill increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a similar step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a advisory statement calling for a ban for minors except if parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a useful starting point," commented a leading European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Previously, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a girl who died after viewing harmful social media material suggests that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create products and services that are safe and age appropriate for minors," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, action is mostly unfolding at the local government level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed laws demanding adult authorization for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some politicians to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of these regions, further countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, world organizations strike a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The agency notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to improve safety.

As this global debate evolves, the actions of Australia and several other countries indicate that states internationally are increasingly content to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.